Occupational profile
Document time allocation, physical and mental demands, and the duties that define the occupation.
If a German insurer denies occupational disability benefits or later stops an accepted pension, the precise duties of your last occupation, the medical evidence, and the insurer's stated reasons become central.
These issues are particularly important for a potentially long-term monthly benefit:
You receive a clear assessment of the facts and evidence supporting the pension claim and the appropriate response to the insurer.
Full service in English language
Document time allocation, physical and mental demands, and the duties that define the occupation.
Connect findings, treatment history, and functional restrictions to the actual work.
Assess rescission, policy adjustment, or avoidance based on pre-contract health answers.
Review the reasons and comparison used when an insurer stops an existing benefit.
The occupational profile, medical capacity, and policy wording must fit together. A weakness in only one layer can undermine the whole claim.
The test is not an abstract job title but the real working day before the restrictions arose, including time shares and defining duties.
The evidence must show which duties can no longer be performed, or only with restrictions, and how material they were to the occupation.
Medical reports, alternative occupations, work reorganisation, and health disclosures are assessed separately under the policy and the applicable burden of proof.
Usually not on its own. The decisive question is how the condition affects the material duties of the occupation you last performed.
That depends on the policy. Training, skills, previous social and financial position, and the exact wording of the alternative-occupation clause must be considered.
Only under the rules governing reassessment. The insurer must explain the relevant change in a legally sufficient way.
The questions asked, your knowledge, fault, causation, and the insurer's deadlines must be examined separately. Rescission or avoidance is not automatically valid.
3 months ago
Mr. Lerch provided me with highly professional, calm, and dedicated support throughout my legal proceedings. I particularly appreciated his honest assessment of my case and the clear communication he maintained throughout the entire process. Thanks to his strategy and preparation, we achieved a significantly better outcome than originally anticipated in the penalty order. I felt well-advised and taken seriously at all times. I can therefore wholeheartedly recommend Mr. Lerch and thank him again for his support. B. Paal
5 months ago
Complete satisfaction! I needed an expert opinion for the recognition of professional experience towards my studies and received very professional support and advice from Mr. Lerch throughout the entire process. The fact that the application for recognition was accepted was simply the icing on the cake!
5 months ago
Thank you so much for your prompt assistance in my rather complex case. I can highly recommend you – reliable, friendly, and straightforward!
Step 1
You describe what happened and provide the policy, terms, and the insurer's decision.
Step 2
The policy, objections, deadlines, and evidence are assessed together.
Step 3
You receive clear guidance on the claim, the risks, and commercially sensible options.
Step 4
We agree on negotiations and, where needed, proceedings before the German courts.
Dr Philipp Lerch represents policyholders in denied and terminated occupational disability claims in Germany. The work focuses on the actual occupation, the medical evidence, and a commercially sound strategy for the long-term benefit.

Overview of denied, reduced, and delayed insurance claims in Germany.
If a daily allowance insurer disputes incapacity for work or alleges occupational disability.
If lasting accident injuries exist and the lump-sum disability benefit is disputed.