Insured occupation
Document the last occupation and its actual demands as the relevant assessment benchmark.
If a German private health insurer stops daily sickness allowance during a prolonged illness, ongoing income protection may disappear immediately. Insurers often dispute total incapacity for work or allege that the condition has become occupational disability.
Before responding, these issues should be clarified:
You receive clear guidance on whether the termination is supported by the policy and medical evidence, and how continued payment or defence of repayment can be pursued.
Full service in English language
Document the last occupation and its actual demands as the relevant assessment benchmark.
Connect medical findings and functional limits to every material part of the occupation.
Test the examination basis, assumed facts, and conclusions of the insurer's report.
Assess the validity, timing, and financial consequences of termination separately.
Incapacity for work can change over time. Occupational demands, medical findings, examinations, and insurer letters therefore need to be placed on a reliable timeline.
The question is whether the actual occupation can be performed as a whole under the policy, not merely whether isolated tasks remain possible.
An alleged recovery or transition to occupational disability must be established at a defensible point in time and on reliable facts.
Ending future benefits, any transition payment, and reclaiming past payments are legally distinct questions.
That depends on the insured event and termination clauses. Relevant grounds may include the end of total incapacity for work or occupational disability established under the policy.
Policy duties may require an examination. Its scope, reasonableness, and the information requested should be checked against the policy.
A repayment claim needs its own legal basis. The period, information available, prior benefit decision, and alleged overpayment must be assessed separately.
It may be appropriate, but the differing occupational descriptions, medical statements, and policy tests should be coordinated carefully.
3 months ago
Mr. Lerch provided me with highly professional, calm, and dedicated support throughout my legal proceedings. I particularly appreciated his honest assessment of my case and the clear communication he maintained throughout the entire process. Thanks to his strategy and preparation, we achieved a significantly better outcome than originally anticipated in the penalty order. I felt well-advised and taken seriously at all times. I can therefore wholeheartedly recommend Mr. Lerch and thank him again for his support. B. Paal
5 months ago
Complete satisfaction! I needed an expert opinion for the recognition of professional experience towards my studies and received very professional support and advice from Mr. Lerch throughout the entire process. The fact that the application for recognition was accepted was simply the icing on the cake!
5 months ago
Thank you so much for your prompt assistance in my rather complex case. I can highly recommend you – reliable, friendly, and straightforward!
Step 1
You describe what happened and provide the policy, terms, and the insurer's decision.
Step 2
The policy, objections, deadlines, and evidence are assessed together.
Step 3
You receive clear guidance on the claim, the risks, and commercially sensible options.
Step 4
We agree on negotiations and, where needed, proceedings before the German courts.
Dr Philipp Lerch represents privately insured clients when German daily sickness allowance is stopped or reclaimed. The work focuses on the actual occupation, medical evidence, and the distinction from occupational disability.

Overview of denied, reduced, and delayed insurance claims in Germany.
If long-term ability to work and an occupational disability pension are central.
If lasting impairment follows an accident and a lump-sum benefit is disputed.