Insured event
Determine the cause and precise cover from the schedule, terms, and endorsements.
After serious damage to a home in Germany, reconstruction, financing, and continued use may all be at risk. If the insurer denies or substantially reduces the claim, the cause, policy wording, and valuation must be analysed separately.
Major building and consequential-loss claims commonly turn on these issues:
You receive a structured assessment of the insured heads of loss, the weaknesses in the reduction, and the evidence now required.
Full service in English language
Determine the cause and precise cover from the schedule, terms, and endorsements.
Compare the insurer's technical findings with independent evidence and the loss history.
Quantify rebuilding, ancillary costs, loss of rent, and other insured items.
Challenge reductions and seek reasonable advance payments where a minimum loss is established.
In a major building claim, repair estimates alone are not enough. The insured event must first be established, after which each relevant head of loss must be evidenced.
The fire scene, pipework, moisture, and damaged components should be recorded so that the insured event remains provable later.
Beyond construction work, demolition, clean-up, planning, protection, and other contractually insured costs may be relevant.
Breach of duty, increased risk, underinsurance, and gross negligence have different requirements and legal consequences.
No. The technical cause, repair method, and cost assessment can be tested against further evidence or an independent report.
The insurer may argue that the insured sum was below the building's insured value. Whether a reduction is permitted depends on the policy wording and any waiver of underinsurance.
An advance may be available if liability and a minimum amount are established. The evidence and state of the claim investigation matter.
A reduction requires the contractual and statutory conditions to be met. The allegation, causation, and reduction percentage must be examined closely.
3 months ago
Mr. Lerch provided me with highly professional, calm, and dedicated support throughout my legal proceedings. I particularly appreciated his honest assessment of my case and the clear communication he maintained throughout the entire process. Thanks to his strategy and preparation, we achieved a significantly better outcome than originally anticipated in the penalty order. I felt well-advised and taken seriously at all times. I can therefore wholeheartedly recommend Mr. Lerch and thank him again for his support. B. Paal
5 months ago
Complete satisfaction! I needed an expert opinion for the recognition of professional experience towards my studies and received very professional support and advice from Mr. Lerch throughout the entire process. The fact that the application for recognition was accepted was simply the icing on the cake!
5 months ago
Thank you so much for your prompt assistance in my rather complex case. I can highly recommend you – reliable, friendly, and straightforward!
Step 1
You describe what happened and provide the policy, terms, and the insurer's decision.
Step 2
The policy, objections, deadlines, and evidence are assessed together.
Step 3
You receive clear guidance on the claim, the risks, and commercially sensible options.
Step 4
We agree on negotiations and, where needed, proceedings before the German courts.
Dr Philipp Lerch represents policyholders in substantial German building and property claims. The focus is on reliable technical evidence, complete valuation, and effective claim handling with the insurer.

Overview of cover reviews, claim denials, and enforcement in Germany.
If an insurer refuses a substantial death benefit.
If a lump-sum disability benefit is reduced or denied after an accident.